Drink up, David Beckham, for your reported $250 million contract on U.S. soil, or turf, depending on the venue.
The question that weighs heavy on his contract is this: Can this extremely handsome face do for a failing U.S. sport what Pelé did for it in 1975? I don't think so.
For 32 years our country has been ridiculed by, basically, the rest of the world, for grabbing the skill-deteriorating soccer greats from other countries to attempt a kick-start in soccer sales, soccer attention, soccer anything.
Last year, Brazil's Ronaldo was rumored to have been offered $120 million for ten years with the New York Red Bulls. THAT would get me out more to Giants Stadium. Ronaldo is amazing to watch. At 29 years old, he'll stay with Real Madrid but may also be looking to a U.S. team for his "retirement years."
Pele was 35 on his signing in 1975 (for $7 million) to the NASL's New York Cosmos, compared to Beckham who is now 31 and signed with the MLS' LA Galaxy for 5 years. How did it work for Pele? It's simple - he brought beauty to the game itself. He made the game magical and astonishing to watch. His intentions were not financial gain - although with his signing he was the world's highest paid athlete of the time. He claimed he'd rather help make soccer "truly popular" in the U.S.
I don't see that passion in Beckham.